Posts

Showing posts with the label Hospitality Development

Building the Technical Backbone

Image
  Once the broad concept direction begins taking shape, the next stage involves translating that intent into a structured technical framework where each consultant operates within a clearly defined scope. This is the point at which design intent begins to move from random abstract ideas of the architect into coordinated design. Soon the discipline of execution will start to sit alongside the ambition of the concept. At this stage, the core team is already in place. By core team, I refer to the group responsible for shaping what will eventually become the physical and operational reality of the project. This typically includes the design consultants, the cost consultant, and, in the case of larger or more complex developments, a Project Management Consultant (PMC) whose role is to ensure that the entire process remains aligned in direction, pace, and sequencing. The core design team generally comprises the Architect, the Interior Designer, the Structural and MEP Engineers, and the C...

Speaking the Language of Hospitality

Image
Before moving further into design development, it may be useful to pause and look at some of the language commonly used within the industry. Hospitality development comes with its own vocabulary. Some of these terms are operational. Others are financial, technical, or design-related. Many appear repeatedly during feasibility studies, operator negotiations, concept development, budgeting, and project execution. Understanding these terms becomes increasingly important as projects move from early planning into active development. Several of them directly influence area allocation, staffing models, operational efficiency, and ultimately, project profitability. This is not intended to be a comprehensive glossary. That would become far too long and unnecessarily academic. Instead, these are some of the more practical terms that frequently appear during hotel development discussions and feasibility evaluations. For simplicity, I will keep them broadly grouped by category rather than strictly...